[1]胡翼,于海,郭鑫,等.融合句法信息的实体关系联合抽取[J].计算机技术与发展,2024,34(08):93-100.[doi:10.20165/j.cnki.ISSN1673-629X.2024.0149]
　HU Yi,YU Hai,GUO Xin,et al.Syntactic Information Fused Joint Entity Relation Extraction[J].,2024,34(08):93-100.[doi:10.20165/j.cnki.ISSN1673-629X.2024.0149]
点击复制

融合句法信息的实体关系联合抽取

《计算机技术与发展》[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
34
期数:
2024年08期
页码:
93-100
栏目:
人工智能
出版日期:
2024-08-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
Syntactic Information Fused Joint Entity Relation Extraction
文章编号:
1673-629X(2024)08-0093-08
作者:
胡翼1; 于海2; 郭鑫1; 陈千1; 廖健1; 郑建兴1; 李艳红1; 杨可涵1
1. 山西大学 计算机与信息技术学院,山西 太原 030006; 2. 中国移动通信集团山西有限公司,山西 太原 030024
Author(s):
HU Yi1; YU Hai2; GUO Xin1; CHEN Qian1; LIAO Jian1; ZHENG Jian-xing1; LI Yan-hong1; YANG Ke-han1
1. School of Computer and Information Technology,Shanxi University,Taiyuan 030006,China; 2. China Mobile Communications Group Shanxi Co. ,Ltd. ,Taiyuan 030024,China
关键词:
关系抽取; 句法依存分析; 图卷积神经网络; 特征融合; 关系重叠
Keywords:
relation extraction; syntactic dependency analysis; graph convolution neural network; feature fusion; relationship overlap
分类号:
TP391
DOI:
10.20165/j.cnki.ISSN1673-629X.2024.0149
摘要:
实体关系抽取是自然语言处理领域知识图谱构建的关键技术之一,有助于知识图谱自动化更新和扩充,并为下游 任务提供重要的知识库支持。 目前实体关系抽取方法大多从单一角度进行特征提取,导致特征表达能力不足,同时级联错误累积现象严重,无法较好针对实体关系重叠、实体嵌套现象进行适配,极大地影响实体关系抽取的精度和效率。 为了同时解决这些问题,提出了一种融合语义和依存句法信息的实体关系联合抽取方法。 该方法采用预训练语言模型 BERT提取语义特征;然后利用句法注意力图卷积神经网络获取依存句法特征;最终,融合语义特征和依存句法特征对句子中多个关系的主客实体位置进行预测标记。 实验结果表明,所提模型在 NYT 和 WebNLG 公共数据集上的 F1 值分别达到了92. 8% 和 91. 1% ,与基线模型和其他深度学习模型相比,模型在重叠实体抽取上取得了较好的效果,验证了模型的有效性。
Abstract:
Entity relation extraction is one of the key task of knowledge graph construction in natural language processing. It helps to update and expand the knowledge graph automatically,and provides important knowledge base support for downstream tasks. At present,most entity relationship extraction methods extract features from a single perspective,resulting in insufficient feature expression ability.Meanwhile,the accumulation of cascading errors is severe,making it difficult to adapt well to the phenomenon of overlapping and nested entity relationships,greatly affecting the accuracy and efficiency of entity relationship extraction. To solve these problems at the same time,we propose a new joint entity relation extraction method that combines semantic and dependency syntactic information. First,pre-trained language model BERT is used to extract semantic features. Then,syntactic attention graph convolutional network is used to obtain syntactic features of fusion dependency information. Finally,dependency syntactic features and semantic features are combined to predict the position of subject and object entities in multiple relationships in a sentence. Experimental results show that the F1 value of the proposed model on NYT and WebNLG public data sets reaches 92. 8% and 91. 1% respectively. Compared with the baseline model and other deep learning models,the proposed model achieves better results in overlapping entity extraction,which verifies its effectiveness.

相似文献/References:

[1]田 芳,孙 晓,孙本旺.基于网络知识百科的情感语义抽取研究[J].计算机技术与发展,2019,29(06):52.[doi:10. 3969 / j. issn. 1673-629X. 2019. 06. 011]
　TIAN Fang,SUN Xiao,SUN Ben-wang.Research on Extraction of Affective Lexical Semantic Using Encyclopedia of Network Knowledge[J].,2019,29(08):52.[doi:10. 3969 / j. issn. 1673-629X. 2019. 06. 011]
[2]尹 鹏,周 林,郭 强,等.基于短语级注意力机制的关系抽取方法[J].计算机技术与发展,2019,29(09):24.[doi:10. 3969 / j. issn. 1673-629X. 2019. 09. 005]
　YIN Peng,ZHOU Lin,GUO Qiang,et al.Relation Extraction Based on Phrase-level Attention[J].,2019,29(08):24.[doi:10. 3969 / j. issn. 1673-629X. 2019. 09. 005]
[3]盖素丽,檀改芳,唐 松,等.面向科技服务的专家推荐模型研究[J].计算机技术与发展,2022,32(10):21.[doi:10. 3969 / j. issn. 1673-629X. 2022. 10. 004]
　GE Su-li,TAN Gai-fang,TANG Song,et al.Expert Recommendation Model for Technology Services[J].,2022,32(08):21.[doi:10. 3969 / j. issn. 1673-629X. 2022. 10. 004]
[4]张 鑫,冼广铭*,梅灏洋,等.基于 Span 方法和多叉解码树的实体关系抽取[J].计算机技术与发展,2023,33(05):152.[doi:10. 3969 / j. issn. 1673-629X. 2023. 05. 023]
　ZHANG Xin,XIAN Guang-ming*,MEI Hao-yang,et al.Entity Relation Extraction Based on Span Method and Multi-fork Decoding Tree[J].,2023,33(08):152.[doi:10. 3969 / j. issn. 1673-629X. 2023. 05. 023]
[5]卜意磊,庞文迪,吴甜甜,等.面向食品监管领域的知识图谱构建研究[J].计算机技术与发展,2023,33(06):202.[doi:10. 3969 / j. issn. 1673-629X. 2023. 06. 030]
　BU Yi-lei,PANG Wen-di,WU Tian-tian,et al.Research on Knowledge Graph Construction for Food Supervision[J].,2023,33(08):202.[doi:10. 3969 / j. issn. 1673-629X. 2023. 06. 030]
[6]付学敬,丁肖摇.基于多层次语义感知的中文关系抽取研究[J].计算机技术与发展,2024,34(01):143.[doi:10. 3969 / j. issn. 1673-629X. 2024. 01. 021]
　FU Xue-jing,DING Xiao-yao.Research on Chinese Relation Extraction Based on Multi-level Semantic Perception[J].,2024,34(08):143.[doi:10. 3969 / j. issn. 1673-629X. 2024. 01. 021]
[7]姚飞杨,刘晓静*.基于 RoBERTa-Effg-Adv 的实体关系联合抽取方法[J].计算机技术与发展,2024,34(03):147.[doi:10. 3969 / j. issn. 1673-629X. 2024. 03. 022]
　YAO Fei-yang,LIU Xiao-jing*.Entity and Relation Joint Extraction Method Based on RoBERTa-Effg-Adv[J].,2024,34(08):147.[doi:10. 3969 / j. issn. 1673-629X. 2024. 03. 022]
[8]冯筠,刘星雨,栗凯旋,等.课程知识图谱自动构建综述[J].计算机技术与发展,2025,(01):1.[doi:10.20165/j.cnki.ISSN1673-629X.2024.0267]
　FENG Jun,LIU Xing-yu,LI Kai-xuan,et al.Survey of Automatic Construction of Course Knowledge Graph[J].,2025,(08):1.[doi:10.20165/j.cnki.ISSN1673-629X.2024.0267]

更新日期/Last Update: 2024-08-10